To all who read this blog:
In order to make some scratch off of this endeavor, I'll be making all future posts here: http://basementnoise.hubpages.com/. This site has posting guidelines, so I won't be allowed to go months without updating and this can only mean good things to you who follow and read my posts. Please follow me to my new page for more reviews, essays and opinions with some regularity. At least more than there has been on this page.
Here I'll be writing about films, new and old. I'll rate and review them. I'll use a four star system, starting with 0*-**** with half stars in between.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Great Movies of the 2000s: United 93 (2006)
Director: Paul Greengrass
Runtime: 111 minutes
United 93 is a film that, in great
detail and with remarkable pace, tells the story of September 11, 2001. There are no well-known actors, in fact many
of the air-traffic controllers and military people play themselves. The first part of the film focuses on Ben
Sliney (playing himself), the man in command of the FAA air-traffic control,
responsible for all of the aircraft taking off, in the air and landing
throughout the entire country. This is
Sliney’s last day on the job, as he has just been promoted and he is about to
move into a different role (this is not explained, only mentioned in passing). Sliney begins getting reports of hijackings,
something that really hasn’t happened for many years, and he starts tracking
the planes, speaking with local air-traffic controls and with the
military. The film eventually shifts to
only being on United 93, the only plane that did not reach its destination
because the passengers rallied and overtook the hijackers and crashed the plane
near Shanksville, PA.
The
construction of the film is what makes this less of a drama or a re-enacted
documentary. None of the lines sound
like memorized, written lines. Everything
sounds real and conversational and natural.
Casting the real people who were dealing with the situation was a stroke
of inspiration for director Greengrass. It
makes everything feel more real which helps to bring up the level of
tension. I submit that there has not
been better non-professional acting since the Neo-Realism movement in post-WWII
Italy. It also takes a great measure of
courage to relive one of the worst events to befall this country and replay the
same role you were in that very day, forced to make the same calls (right or
wrong) and not be able to change anything.
The camera
work in this film also lends to its reality.
The cinematographer, Barry Ackroyd, worked with Greengrass to make the ‘queasy-cam’
more of a fly-on-the-wall cinema-verite style.
Using this model, Greengrass is able to make us feel like we are
watching the events unfold. He also
wisely avoids using timestamps so we are not distracted from the action and do
not become concerned with the tick-tock of the day.
When the
film cuts away from the control rooms and stays within the plane (approximately
the last 45 minutes of the film), the tension is ratcheted up to levels
Hitchcock could only have dreamed of. The
fear and action is so stirring, I find myself wondering if they’re going to win
this time, pull the plane out of the fall and land safely. The atmosphere becomes so claustrophobic that
the air around you seems to get stuffy, no matter where you are. When the plane ultimately crashes, the
release is so great my only reaction, every time I’ve seen it, is to tear up
and cry a little.
I first
saw this film in the theaters six years ago.
At that point, the real events had only happened five years before and
many thought the film was put out too close to the tragedy. I didn’t think so then, and I don’t think so
now. The film is a tribute to the spirit
and sacrifice of the passengers to save others. They knew they were going to die, although
they hoped they didn’t have to.
The greatness
of this film is its construction, sure, but also the way it uses our emotions
to bring us into the situation. It plays
to the audience’s emotions without cloying at them. When there is an emotional response, it is
earned by the film, not set up just so the audience will cry or gasp, or
fear. The audience becomes one of the
characters in the film. You feel like
you’re in the control room, waiting for Sliney to ask you a question. You feel like you’re on the plane, ready to
rush up with the others to take down the hijackers and try and save your fellow
passengers who until just a couple hours ago were total strangers.
That is the ultimate power of this
film. It makes you forget that it is a film;
it turns itself into a living moment in time, one that can be revisited if you
have the fortitude to do so. It brings
out all of the bad and good of that infamous day and provides somewhat of a
catharsis for those unresolved feelings that we as a nation still hold on to
these eleven years after the event. Yes,
Osama bin Laden is dead and Al Qaeda is mostly demolished (or at least severely
weakened), but those facts cannot undo what was done. September 11, 2001 hurt this country greatly
and its effects are still being felt as I suspect they always will be to some
degree or another. This film gives us a
glimpse of what happened on the ground and a good supposition of what happened
in the air.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)